Hi Robert, there is no limit of HF/CS but my experience is, that you have a better performance if you use MySQL, compared to HF/CS. There are also some other posts here in the forum discussing the performance of several database systems. My opinion: HF/CS is a good and stable database system, but others like MySQL are better suitet for a large project. So if I where you, I would tend to uby stefan.kern - WinDev Forum
RobertLeo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Stefan, > > wouldn't using a local database bloat the apk > size? Or is my understanding of local DB wrong? Hi Robert, I would not deliver the tables within the APK. Just do Hcreation or Hcreationifnotfound() If you use HF on Android you have to deliver the database framework, which is quby stefan.kern - WinDev Forum
Hi Robert, as Argus said: - use a local database on the device, so the user works on a local database with a good performance, independant of the internet connection quality. You can manage everything locally. - Then use a replication system (I personally had a look at Fabrice Solution, and as far as I know this solution can only handle H-commands, but no Inserrt or Update SQL commands.) Soby stefan.kern - WinDev Forum
Hi Robert, in addition to Argus: I switched an WD application to MYSql, and can say that there is a noticable performance improvement. Also I am the opion that MySQL is a grown database system, compared to MySQL HFCS is a toy. (Replication System, management tools, performance). This application is very database orientated, but I had a very few changes in code only. Regarding the automaby stefan.kern - WinDev Forum