Home
>
WinDev Forum
>
Topic
Interlocked Increment()
Posted by Robin Lane
|
Interlocked Increment() April 23, 2019 07:53AM |
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 10 |
Hi All,
I have an app which works okay when run in test mode on my development machine.
I've recently tried to deploy it onto another laptop and although it installs fine, I'm getting the following error when trying a certain process.
Can anyone point me in the right direction please?
Many thanks,
Robin.
I have an app which works okay when run in test mode on my development machine.
I've recently tried to deploy it onto another laptop and although it installs fine, I'm getting the following error when trying a certain process.
Can anyone point me in the right direction please?
Many thanks,
Robin.
Error at line 28 of Local Procedure CrewPopTable process. Unexpected system error. If this error systematically occurs in the same conditions, contact PC SOFT Hot Line and specify: - the error circumstances, - a window, a project or the code lines used to replicate the problem, - the details below. Details techniques : Module : KERNEL32.DLL Adresse de base : 76160000 Erreur systeme : Access violation (GPF) EIP = 7617716B OS : Windows 8 (6.2.9200) ----- Technical Information ----- Project : DPR Analyser WL call: Process of 'Local Procedure CrewPopTable' (WIN_Search.PROCEDURE.CrewPopTable), line 28, thread 0 What happened? Unexpected system error. If this error systematically occurs in the same conditions, contact PC SOFT Hot Line and specify: - the error circumstances, - a window, a project or the code lines used to replicate the problem, - the details below. Details techniques : Module : KERNEL32.DLL Adresse de base : 76160000 Erreur systeme : Access violation (GPF) EIP = 7617716B OS : Windows 8 (6.2.9200) Error code: 1020 Level: fatal error Dump of the error of 'wd210vm.dll' module (21.0.330.0). Identifier of detailed information (.err): 1020 Debugging information: Details techniques : Module : KERNEL32.DLL Adresse de base : 76160000 Erreur systeme : Access violation (GPF) EIP = 7617716B OS : Windows 8 (6.2.9200) Registres : EIP = 7617716B EBP = 0019D330 EAX = 00000001 EBX = 00000001 ECX = FFFFFFF3 EDX = 00000001 ESI = 03420060 EDI = 035EC480 Pile des appels : [KERNEL32.DLL (76160000)] 76177160 : InterlockedIncrement() + 11 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 25EEBE20 : EXT_bSetVariableCollection() + 321689 bytes [???] 0019D394 [???] 0250E130 [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 25E9CF70 : Execution() + 39760 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 25E9CF70 : Execution() + 33552 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 25E9CF70 : Execution() + 33584 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 25E9CF70 : Execution() + 33616 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 25E9CF70 : Execution() + 33632 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 25E9CF70 : Execution() + 33648 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 25E9CF70 : Execution() + 33664 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 25E9CF70 : Execution() + 45088 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 25E9CF70 : Execution() + 33680 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 25E9CF70 : Execution() + 33712 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 25E9CF70 : Execution() + 33728 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 25E9CF70 : Execution() + 39392 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 25E9CF70 : Execution() + 39680 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 25E9CF70 : Execution() + 50000 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 26061A60 : EXT_pszGetMessageErreurDelegue() + 152256 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 26061A60 : EXT_pszGetMessageErreurDelegue() + 152256 bytes [wd210vm.dll (25E60000), 21.0.330.0, 01A210067f] 25E7DC50 : DeclareProxy() + 82400 bytes Additional Information: EIT_PILEWL : Local Procedure CrewPopTable (WIN_Search.PROCEDURE.CrewPopTable), line 28 Selecting a row of CBO_Crew (WIN_Search.CBO_Crew), line 4 Click BTN_Search (WIN_Main.BTN_Search), line 2 EIT_DATEHEURE : 23/04/2019 06:43:36 EIT_TYPE_WDFILE : <2> EIT_IDCODE : <458752> Help
|
Re: Interlocked Increment() April 23, 2019 08:04AM |
Admin Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 501 |
Hi Robin,
this is a GPF - a General Protection Fault. This means that the application accessed an address outside of the address space reserved for your application. If your application is made of WINDEV functions only then only PC Soft will be able to explain the cause of the problem.
If you want a hint then you should release the code of selecting a row of Table "CBO_Crew" and what is behind button BTN_Search. All in all, I fear, even with that code we will not be able to explain.
However, is that computer definitely free of any viruses, malware, adware etc?
Kind regards,
Guenter Predl
office@windev.at
this is a GPF - a General Protection Fault. This means that the application accessed an address outside of the address space reserved for your application. If your application is made of WINDEV functions only then only PC Soft will be able to explain the cause of the problem.
If you want a hint then you should release the code of selecting a row of Table "CBO_Crew" and what is behind button BTN_Search. All in all, I fear, even with that code we will not be able to explain.
However, is that computer definitely free of any viruses, malware, adware etc?
Kind regards,
Guenter Predl
office@windev.at
|
Re: Interlocked Increment() April 23, 2019 08:47AM |
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 10 |
Hi Guenter,
Thank you for your quick reply.
When you say "release the code", do you mean publish it here? I am more than happy to do so if it would help.
I have sent a request to PC Soft, however as an update I get the same error on two separate machines & also when I tried installing the app on my development laptop too.
It is strange that it runs great while in test mode.
Cheers,
Robin.
Thank you for your quick reply.
When you say "release the code", do you mean publish it here? I am more than happy to do so if it would help.
I have sent a request to PC Soft, however as an update I get the same error on two separate machines & also when I tried installing the app on my development laptop too.
It is strange that it runs great while in test mode.
Cheers,
Robin.
|
Re: Interlocked Increment() April 23, 2019 09:38AM |
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 10 |
Here is the code:
and the Called routine at line 28 is:
PROCEDURE CrewPopTable()
dDateF, dDateT is Date
nCrewID is int
sData is string
arrData is array of strings
arrDataTbT is array of 4 strings
arrCboID is array of 5 int
arrCboName is array of 5 strings
arrCboID = [3, 4, 7, 10, 15]
arrCboName = ["Toolbox Talk", "Drills", "Induction", "Crew Change", "Crew Shift Change"]
// get variables for query
dDateF = EDT_DateFrom
dDateT = EDT_DateTo
nCrewID = CBO_Crew..StoredValue
// for each of the 5 activities in the arrays above loop through & look for CrewID
IF DateValid(dDateF) AND DateValid(dDateT) THEN
FOR i = 1 TO 5
HExecuteQuery(QRY_ActivityByDateAndID, hQueryDefault, dDateF, dDateT, arrCboID)
HReadFirst(QRY_ActivityByDateAndID)
WHILE NOT HOut(QRY_ActivityByDateAndID)
SWITCH arrCboID
CASE 3: // TbT
arrData = CrewCSigneesFind(QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.ActivityID)
arrDataTbT = Split_3(QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.Description)
IF ArrayCount(arrData) > 0 THEN
FOR j = 1 TO ArrayCount(arrData)
IF arrData[j] < 0 THEN
sData = arrDataTbT[1]
ELSE
sData = " - " +arrData[j] +" - "
END
TableAddLine(TBL_Crew, QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.Date, QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.Time, ...
QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.VesselName, arrCboName, sData, QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.ActivityID)
END
END
CASE 4: // Drill
arrData = CrewDrillFind(QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.ActivityID)
IF ArrayCount(arrData) > 0 THEN
FOR k = 1 TO ArrayCount(arrData)
TableAddLine(TBL_Crew, QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.Date, QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.Time, ...
QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.VesselName, arrCboName, arrData[k], QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.ActivityID)
END
END
CASE 7: // Induction
arrData = CrewCSigneesFind(QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.ActivityID)
IF ArrayCount(arrData) > 0 THEN
FOR l = 1 TO ArrayCount(arrData)
IF arrData[l] < 0 THEN
sData = " - - "
ELSE
sData = arrData[l]
END
TableAddLine(TBL_Crew, QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.Date, QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.Time, ...
QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.VesselName, arrCboName, sData, QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.ActivityID)
END
END
CASE 10: // Crew Change
arrData = CrewCSigneesFind(QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.ActivityID)
IF ArrayCount(arrData) > 0 THEN
FOR m = 1 TO ArrayCount(arrData)
IF arrData[m] = 0 THEN
sData = "Signed OFF"
ELSE IF arrData[m] = 1
sData = "Signed ON"
ELSE
sData = arrData[m]
END
TableAddLine(TBL_Crew, QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.Date, QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.Time, ...
QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.VesselName, arrCboName, sData, QRY_ActivityByDateAndID.ActivityID)
END
END
CASE 15: // Shift Change
OTHER CASE
END
HReadNext(QRY_ActivityByDateAndID)
END
HCancelDeclaration(QRY_ActivityByDateAndID)
END
TableSort(TBL_Crew, "Col_Date", "Col_Time")
ELSE
Info("Enter valid dates")
END
and the Called routine at line 28 is:
PROCEDURE CrewCSigneesFind(xActID) nCrewID is int arrResult is array of int nCrewID = CBO_Crew..StoredValue HReadSeek(CrewSignees, ActivityID, xActID, hIdentical) WHILE HFound(CrewSignees) = True IF CrewSignees.CrewID = nCrewID THEN ArrayAdd(arrResult, CrewSignees.SignOnOff) END HReadNext(CrewSignees, ActivityID) END HCancelSeek(CrewSignees, ActivityID) RESULT arrResult
|
Re: Interlocked Increment() April 23, 2019 11:24AM |
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 141 |
|
Re: Interlocked Increment() April 23, 2019 12:21PM |
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 10 |
Good Afternoon Piet,
You are correct (on both counts).
I hadn't recognised the int array to string array issue & it is definitely not good practice.
Also, correcting this has fixed the Interlocked Increment() problem I was having when the app was deployed.
Very many thanks for taking the time to read through my code & identify the problem.
Cheers,
Robin.
You are correct (on both counts).
I hadn't recognised the int array to string array issue & it is definitely not good practice.
Also, correcting this has fixed the Interlocked Increment() problem I was having when the app was deployed.
Very many thanks for taking the time to read through my code & identify the problem.
Cheers,
Robin.